It turns out that when I switched us from `assert` to `assert.strict`,
I didn't actually update any existing tests or tell anyone:
0df0d234f2
So apparently everyone else just kept on using `strictEqual`.
This will be a PR and also throw an error if people continue trying to
use it, which should make it much clearer what PS policy is on this.
A lot of the problem may be that TypeScript marks assert.strict.equal
as deprecated when it's not. This was fixed 4 days ago:
https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/pull/48452
But this probably hasn't made it to a thing yet. Until then, you'll
have to deal with TS marking your tests as deprecated, but it shouldn't
be too long.
Accidentally using `assert` instead of `assert.strict` should now show
an error. This protects against the probably much worse mistake of
accidentally using `assert.equal` rather than `assert.strict.equal`.
`assert.ok` is also deprecated now.
This replaces the old approach with a new "clear everything except a
whitelist" approach, which should overall involve much less code and
lead to fewer bugs of the "the path changed for a module and I forgot
to update the uncache paths" variety.
I considered a lot of other approaches, but they seem to have more
flaws without any advantages in exchange for them. (We moved away
from `uncacheTree` because it only tracks the first require: there's
no way to get a full list of dependents for a module, only its first
dependent.)
The server now uses the same approach as the client of treating
cosmetic formes as real formes, as documented in `FORMES.md`.
This eliminates the need for the `.forme` and `.speciesid` properties
of `Pokemon`.
`pokemon.id` has also been removed: useful, since it turns out half
of its uses were bugs that should have used `pokemon.species.id`.
Not having prefer-const on the JS side makes JS -> TS refactors really
unreadable. This commit just auto-fixes it so we're using
`prefer-const` everywhere.
`import =` and `export =` are really only intended for backwards
compatibility with CommonJS. While I really don't like the new module
system TC39 has designed for us, it's what we should be using, and
consistency is important.
