Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kurt
d61e646ca9 Minor tweaks 2021-02-18 17:26:06 -08:00
Kurt
83c61a2515 Update EncounterGenerator6.cs 2021-02-17 08:49:32 -08:00
Kurt
f5b47f9116 Update EncounterGenerator6.cs
Closes #3153
wc6 is the only one with deferred cards that matter
2021-02-16 07:35:55 -08:00
Kurt
ebb4e2a56a Defer curry mark static encounters, flag as invalid
Closes #3001 as all marks that can be checked are checked.

Promote trades above static encounters, as it's just met location.
2021-02-14 21:24:31 -08:00
Kurt
5949c3b57e Minor clean 2021-02-14 15:14:45 -08:00
Kurt
1af27516e6 pid encounter type mismatch: returns
Keeping the cryptic message for now :)
2021-02-14 10:20:35 -08:00
Kurt
a65ab2accc Flag wild slots that don't match 32bit correlation 2021-02-13 22:45:07 -08:00
Kurt
862403858b Refactoring
no functional change
2021-02-03 11:33:09 -08:00
Kurt
332449f53d Fix erroneous yield counter increments
https://projectpokemon.org/home/forums/topic/58492-possible-legality-error-for-the-mon-from-pokemon-bank-using-ability-patch-with-the-new-update/
2021-01-31 01:12:20 -08:00
Kurt
1e86fdcea8
Fracture the encounter matching checks to allow progressive validation (#3137)
## Issue

We want to discard-but-remember any slots that aren't a perfect fit, on the off chance that a better one exists later in the search space. If there's no better match, then we gotta go with what we got.

## Example:
Wurmple exists in area `X`, and also has a more rare slot for Silcoon, with the same level for both slots. 
* We have a Silcoon that we've leveled up a few times.

Was our Silcoon originally a Wurmple, or was it caught as a Silcoon? 
* To be sure, we have to check the EC/PID if the Wurmple wouldn't evolve into Cascoon instead.
* We don't want to wholly reject that Wurmple slot, as maybe the Met Level isn't within Silcoon's slot range.

---

Existing implementation would store "deferred" matches in a list; we only need to keep 1 of these matches around (less allocation!). We also want to differentiate between a "good" deferral and a "bad" deferral; I don't think this is necessary but it's currently used by Mystery Gift matching (implemented for the Eeveelution mystery gifts which matter for evolution moves).

The existing logic didn't use inheritance, and instead had static methods being reused across generations. Quite kludgy. Also, the existing logic was a pain to modify the master encounter yield methods, as one generation's quirks had to not impact all other generations that used the method.

---

The new implementation splits out the encounter yielding methods to be separate for each generation / subset. Now, things don't have to check `WasLink` for Gen7 origin, because Pokémon Link wasn't a thing in Gen7.

---

## Future
Maybe refactoring yielders into "GameCores" that expose yielding behaviors / properties, rather than the static logic. As more generations and side-gamegroups get added (thanks LGPE/GO/GameCube), all this switch stuff gets annoying to maintain instead of just overriding/inheritance.

## Conclusion

This shouldn't impact any legality results negatively; if you notice any regressions, report them! This should reduce false flags where we didn't defer-discard an encounter when we should have (wild area mons being confused with raids).
2021-01-29 17:55:27 -08:00