Fix warnings about size_t printf mismatch

This commit is contained in:
Alcaro
2020-01-13 13:53:44 +01:00
parent ebdc448ad7
commit e0de216430
3 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@@ -798,12 +798,12 @@ struct errorinfo ApplyPatchMem2(file* patch, struct mem inrom, bool verifyinput,
//http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/tcxf1dw6.aspx says %zX is not supported
//this is true up to and including Windows Vista; 7 adds support for it
//I could define it to "I", but my GCC does not acknowledge its legitimacy and throws bogus warnings
//instead, let's just define it to size_t's underlying type: long unsigned int / long long unsigned in
//instead, let's just define it to size_t's underlying type: unsigned int / long long unsigned int
#ifdef _WIN32
# ifdef _WIN64
# define z "ll"
# else
# define z "l"
# define z ""
# endif
#else
# define z "z"
@@ -1159,7 +1159,7 @@ void usage()
GUIClaimConsole();
fputs(
// 12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
flipsversion "\n"
flipsversion "\n"
"usage:\n"
" "
#ifndef FLIPS_CLI
@@ -1187,7 +1187,7 @@ void usage()
" delta-moremem is usually slightly (~3%) faster than delta, but uses about\n"
" twice as much memory; it gives identical patches to delta\n"
" linear is the fastest, but tends to give pretty big patches\n"
" all BPS patchers can apply all patch styles, the only difference is filesize\n"
" all BPS patchers can apply all patch styles, the only difference is file size\n"
" and creation performance\n"
"--exact: do not remove SMC headers when applying or creating a BPS patch\n"
" not recommended, may affect patcher compatibility\n"